Ground plane sizing for radio, transponder and PilotAware

Transponder, radio and PilotAware antenna fitting in a non-metallic skinned aircraft

There is often talk around the hangars about poor radio signals and how some aircraft can be heard from great distances while others fail to make contact with a nearby ground station. One commonly overlooked cause is a missing or wrongly sized ground plane. There are many myths about the purpose of a ground plane, and in this short article, I aim to provide clear guidance on its correct size and function.

Before we look at the ground plane, let’s set expectations on the maximum distance you can be heard.

The civil air band radio is in the VHF (Very High Frequency) band and under normal weather / tropospheric conditions, it requires radio line of sight between the aircraft and the ground station; thus, the maximum range is simply the distance to the radio horizon. For simplicity, we assume the ground station is at sea level.

The radio horizon distance is given by the formula: D = K√h

Where D = distance in nautical miles (NM), h = height of aircraft’s antenna above ground level and K = 1.23 when h is expressed in feet

So, when we are flying at 2,000ft, the maximum range to a sea level ground station is 55.00NM or at 3,000ft, 67.34NM

The same is true for transponders, CAP1391 devices e.g. SkyEcho and PilotAware transmissions; however, the limited power and antenna arrangement of CAP1391 and PilotAware means the range is less.

What is a ground plane, and why do we need one?

Keeping this simple, it provides a ¼ wave monopole antenna (also known as a Marconi) with its required counterpart allowing the flow of the electrical current which generates the electrical and magnetic waves that make up the RF signal. The earth acts as a type of electrical “mirror,” effectively providing the other quarter wavelength making it equivalent to a vertical dipole. This, in turn, helps present the correct impedance to the transmitter, thus allowing the maximum power transfer into the antenna, which results in the most efficient transmission of the signal. Most antennas sold for Microlights and light aircraft are ¼ wave.

Ground plane

Does size matter?

I’m afraid the answer is yes, it does! Bigger is generally better, but again there are exceptions and a minimum size for the efficient working. The minimum size is a radius of ¼ the wavelength of the signal being transmitted.  In basic RF theory we were taught that bigger is better, although the benefits of size are less important above 3 times the wavelength. In aviation, while we are flying along, we want our signal to be picked up both above and below the aircraft. The larger the ground plane, the bigger the blind spot we will have on the underside of the ground plane.

Is the shape important?

No, ground planes can be square, circular or many different shapes. If you had a metal aeroplane, the whole fuselage would act as the ground plane for your radio antenna and your transponder antenna. So long as you have at least ¼ wavelength in all directions, then the shape doesn’t matter too much. However, as we want the lightest ground plane we can get, a circle is the optimum shape and supports equal propagation of the signal in all directions.

What should the thickness of the ground plane be?

Any thickness is acceptable; you can use foil tape or discs of different thicknesses, so long as they are mechanically robust enough and conductive.

Can it be a mesh or does it have to be solid?

It can be a mesh (the tighter the mesh, the better) or even multiple radial wires, typically the more the better 8 or 16, but for our purposes, a solid circle is normally the easiest and best option.

What should it be made of?

Copper, however, it can be any material which is a good conductor. Aluminium is a good conductor and can be used; however, you need to be mindful of the galvanic effect between a stainless steel antenna and the ground plane. This may lead to connection issues in the future; thus, I would recommend a thin copper disc.

Why do some avionics companies state to use a square ground plane?

Well, I assume this is just convenience. So long as the diameter of the circle below can fit within the square, it will work fine. Just make sure the antenna is in the middle!

What does all of this mean in practice?

Minimum diameter of ground planes in aviation should be:

N.B. Always round the ground plane size up, not down.

Transponder: frequency 1090MHz, Wavelength 275mm, ¼ wavelength 68.75mm

Minimum ground plane diameter 137.5mm

Radio: lowest frequency 108MHz, Wavelength 2775.85mm, ¼ wavelength 693.96mm

Minimum ground plane diameter 1,387.9mm

PilotAware: external antenna fitting, frequency 869.5MHz, Wavelength 344.79mm, ¼ wavelength 86.19mm

Minimum ground plane diameter 172.39mm

Antenna Theory Is Complicated

Antenna theory is complicated, but if you have a ground plane with the correct minimum size and the antenna mounted in the middle, this will be one less problem.  But let’s quickly prove this is a fact and not just some textbook exercise. As an extreme, let’s consider an antenna without a ground plane vs the same antenna with a correctly sized ground plane.

An external PilotAware antenna without a ground plane is put under test using a low-cost VNA (Vector Network Analyser)




As can be seen opposite the resonant frequency of this antenna is not 869.5MHz as it should be! It is showing a resonance of over 1GHz. The impedance and VSWR for the antenna were also way out; in fact, the reflections from the imbalance could damage the transmitter, or at best, the radiated signal will not be optimal.

Let’s add a makeshift ground plane out of kitchen foil of the recommended size above.




The image shows the effect of adding the ground plane. The resonant frequency has shifted down to be close to the 869.5MHz that we are looking for, the VSWR was down to acceptable limits and the impedance was close to 50 ohms.

Hopefully, this graphically demonstrates the importance of having a correctly sized ground plane!

One last fact! The monopole antenna was invented in 1895 by radio pioneer Guglielmo Marconi

Set QFE in Dashware

I was recently asked how I managed to change the altitude to QFE (ground level) on my videos, well when I can be bothered to do it! So here is how to do it.

I use Dashware to add the tapes to the video before editing the video, I do this before to ensure the data is in sync with the video.

I capture the video using my TomTom Bandit, which has a built in GPS. However like all action cameras I know of, it suffers from strobing on the prop. To overcome the strobing I made an ND8 (neutral density) filter by ordering a plastic ND8 filter from ebay. I cut in a circle and held in place using some large heat shrink. Anyway that’s for another day today we are looking at how to offset the reported altitude. Or put another way QNH to QFE.

For this I will assume you have your data and video file ready and that you know how far out the altitude is.

Below I’m using Dashware version 1.9.1

Load your video in the normal way then:

1.      Open the load data screen

2.      Select the data file and click “Edit Profiles”

3.      Make a clone of the data profile you are using, so that you can edit it.

4.      Add a Math Calculator (bottom left area) that takes the Altitude and subtracts the offset                needed, you may need to play a little with this value. the value is entered into the “Constant Parameter”. use the other settings as shown below.

 

5.      Call this new channel QFE in the output value.

6.      Now add a mapping channel for QFE by clicking the + in column mappings

7.      Map the columns as shown below

8.      Click OK to close the Data Profile Editor screen

9.      Then back at the add data file screen ensure you have the newly create Clone profile selected and click add to show your new altitude.

 

I hope this helps!